RNG Roulette vs. Live Table: Four Clear Differences
In RNG Roulette, the game mechanics are dictated by a Random Number Generator (RNG), a system verifiable for fairness. For instance, American Roulette with its 38 pockets, featuring both 0 and 00, presents a house edge of 5.26%. This contrasts with the 37-pocket European variant, which offers a lower house edge of 2.70% on inside bets when 'La Partage' does not apply.
Live table games, such as Baccarat, involve human dealers and real cards, offering a different player interaction. A standard Baccarat Player bet holds an RTP of 98.76%, with a house edge of 1.24%, whereas the Banker bet, despite a slight edge over Player, becomes more profitable due to commission structures.
The speed of play also differs significantly, with RNG games typically executing much faster than their live counterparts. A single spin on American Roulette can be completed in seconds, allowing for a higher volume of wagers. In contrast, a Baccarat round, including betting time and card reveals, can extend significantly, impacting the number of hands played per hour.
House edge and payouts of table games at Slots-City compared
Push in Blackjack: the bet returns
A 'push' in Blackjack signifies a tie between the player's hand and the dealer's hand, resulting in the player's bet being returned. This outcome does not result in a win or a loss for the player, effectively neutralising the wager for that specific round. In Blackjack games with a 3:2 payout for a natural Blackjack and a 1:1 payout for other wins, a push maintains the player's stake.
For example, when playing Blackjack with a 6 Deck setup and optimal strategy, the RTP can reach 99.54%, yielding a house advantage of 0.46%. This favourable RTP indicates that, over the long term, the casino retains a minimal percentage of wagers, with pushes contributing to this balance by not awarding any profit or loss.
Understanding push scenarios is crucial for high rollers managing their bankroll. A push does not contribute to wagering requirements for bonuses, which often demand a specific turnover amount, such as 40x the bonus value. This means that rounds ending in a push do not advance the player towards meeting the bonus conditions.
Roulette Wheel with 37 vs 38 Pockets
The distinction between a 37-pocket and a 38-pocket roulette wheel fundamentally alters the game's mathematical probabilities and house edge. A 37-pocket wheel, commonly found in European Roulette, includes numbers 1 through 36 plus a single zero (0). This configuration results in a house advantage of 2.70% for inside bets when 'La Partage' or 'En Prison' rules are not applied.
Conversely, the 38-pocket wheel, characteristic of American Roulette, adds a double zero (00) pocket alongside the single zero and numbers 1 through 36. This additional pocket significantly increases the house edge to 5.26% for all bets, including the straight-up bet paying 35:1. This higher edge makes the American version less favourable for players over time.
For high rollers, this difference is substantial; for every €100 wagered on an American wheel, the expected retention by the casino is €5.26. On a European wheel, this expected retention drops to €2.70, representing a nearly double advantage for the player on the 37-pocket wheel. This mathematical disparity often guides experienced players towards European or French roulette variants.
Multihand Blackjack with Up to 5 Hands
Multihand Blackjack allows players to play multiple hands simultaneously, up to a maximum of five hands in some variations. This format enables a higher volume of play and potentially quicker progression towards wagering requirements, such as the 40x turnover stipulated for bonuses. Each hand is played independently according to standard Blackjack rules, with individual bets placed on each.
For instance, if a player has a €2,000 welcome bonus and opts for a 40x wagering requirement, the total turnover needed is €80,000. Playing five hands of Blackjack, each with an RTP of 99.54% (as seen in 6 Deck, S17, DAS, DOA games), can accelerate reaching this target more efficiently than playing single-hand versions, assuming consistent betting.
However, playing multiple hands significantly increases the potential for rapid bankroll depletion if not managed carefully. While the house edge per hand remains constant at 0.46% for optimal strategy play, the exposure to variance is multiplied by the number of hands in play, requiring a robust risk management strategy for high rollers.
Jacks or Better: Check Payout Table Before Betting
The payout structure of Jacks or Better video poker is critically dependent on the specific pay table implemented, directly influencing the Return to Player (RTP) and house edge. A common deviation is the 8/5 pay table, offering 8 coins for a Full House and 5 for a Flush, resulting in an RTP of 97.29% and a house edge of 2.71%.
In contrast, the optimal 9/6 'Full Pay' version, where a Full House pays 9 coins and a Flush pays 6 coins per wagered coin, boasts a superior RTP of 99.54% with a house edge of only 0.46%. This significant difference of 2.25 percentage points in RTP is achieved by minor adjustments in payouts for specific hands.
For high rollers, selecting the 9/6 version is paramount for maximising returns. The difference between these two tables, 9/6 versus 8/5, means that for every €100 wagered, players can expect to retain €2.25 more on the 9/6 table over the long run. This is especially relevant when considering the maximum bet of 5 coins required for the Royal Flush bonus of 4,000 coins.
Game categories at a glance
Category
Examples
Stakes From
Highlight
Slots
Money Train 4, Gonzo's Quest Megaways, Total Overdrive
0,10 EUR
thousands of titles
Table games
Roulette, Blackjack, Baccarat
0,50 EUR
classic rules
Live casino
Blaze Roulette, XXXtreme Lightning Roulette
0,20 EUR
real dealers
Jackpot games
Mega Moolah, Divine Fortune, Age of the Gods
0,20 EUR
progressive pools
Instant games
Aviator, Plinko, Mines
0,10 EUR
fast rounds
Video poker
Jacks or Better, Deuces Wild
0,25 EUR
strategy based
Hold or discard five cards: the decision
In Jacks or Better 8/5 video poker, the player aims to form winning hands by holding or discarding cards from an initial five-card deal. The payout for a Full House is 8 coins, and a Flush pays 5 coins for each coin wagered. This specific paytable results in a Return to Player (RTP) of 97.29%, indicating a 2.71% house edge.
Optimal strategy in Jacks or Better 8/5 dictates which cards to retain based on probability. For instance, holding two pairs offers a better expected return than breaking them to chase a potential straight or flush. The difference between this 8/5 paytable and a higher-paying 9/6 table, where a Full House pays 9 and a Flush pays 6, represents a significant drop in RTP of 2.25 percentage points.
A player utilizing optimal strategy on the 9/6 Jacks or Better variant, which boasts a 99.54% RTP, faces a house advantage of only 0.46%. This contrasts sharply with the 8/5 version, meaning that over a large number of hands, a player at the 9/6 game would theoretically retain a substantially larger portion of their wagers.
How Much Does One Mistake Cost in 100 Hands?
In Blackjack with a 6:5 payout for a natural blackjack instead of the standard 3:2, a player experiences an increased house edge. This rule change, when applied to a six-deck game, adds exactly 1.39 percentage points to the casino's advantage, raising the house edge to 1.85% and the RTP to 98.15%.
Consider a $10 bet on Blackjack under these 6:5 rules; a natural blackjack would pay $12 instead of the more favorable $15. Over 100 hands, assuming a player encounters a blackjack on average once every 20 hands, this reduction in payout could amount to a loss of $30 based solely on this rule variation compared to a 3:2 payout table.
A player consistently making optimal decisions in a six-deck Blackjack game with a 3:2 payout, S17, DAS, and DOA rules still faces a house edge of 0.46% with an RTP of 99.54%. The significant impact of the 6:5 payout rule underscores the importance of understanding game variations for players, especially those with larger bankrolls.
Player pays 1:1 without any commission
The Baccarat Player bet offers a direct 1:1 payout for each winning wager, without any commission charged to the player. This bet has a Return to Player (RTP) of 98.76%, resulting in a house edge of 1.24%. The mathematics of this bet show it is slightly less favorable than the Banker bet, which has a 0.18% advantage over the Player bet.
While the Player bet yields a 1:1 return, the Banker bet, despite a 1.24% house edge, is generally considered more advantageous due to a slightly higher RTP of 98.76% (when not considering commission). The Player bet's payout of 1:1 means a $100 win returns $100 profit, a straightforward exchange.
In contrast, Baccarat Tie bets, which typically pay 9:1, have a significantly higher house edge of 4.84% with an RTP of 95.16%. While the 9:1 payout is common in online Baccarat and reduces the edge from a theoretical 14.36%, it remains considerably less favorable than either the Player or Banker bets.
Pass Line in Craps: Process in Four Steps
The Pass Line bet in Craps is a fundamental wager where players bet on the shooter to win. The initial roll, known as the 'come-out roll', determines the game's progression. If a 7 or 11 is rolled, the Pass Line bet wins immediately; if a 2, 3, or 12 is rolled (craps), the bet loses.
Should any other number (4, 5, 6, 8, 9, or 10) be rolled on the come-out roll, that number becomes the 'point'. The shooter must then roll this point number again before rolling a 7. If the point is established and then rolled again, the Pass Line bet wins; if a 7 is rolled first, the Pass Line bet loses.
The Pass Line bet has a Return to Player (RTP) of 98.59%, resulting in a house edge of 1.41%. For every $100 wagered on the Pass Line, theoretically, $98.59 would be returned to the player over the long run. The Come bet operates with identical mathematics.
Craps Odds Bet with 0 Percent House Edge
The Craps Odds bet, also known as Free Odds, is a unique wager that offers a 0.00% house edge when taken with the Pass Line bet after a point has been established. This bet allows players to wager on the true odds of the point being rolled again before a 7 appears. The payout for this bet is based on actual probabilities.
The odds payouts vary depending on the point number established. For points of 4 or 10, the odds payout is 2:1; for points of 5 or 9, it is 3:2; and for points of 6 or 8, it is 6:5. These payouts are calculated to reflect the precise probability of each outcome, eliminating any built-in casino advantage.
When combined with the Pass Line bet (which has a 0.37% house edge), the overall combined RTP for the Pass Line with 3-4-5x odds is 99.63%. The Free Odds bet itself, independent of the Pass Line, effectively returns 100.00% of wagers over time, making it one of the few opportunities for a zero-edge wager in a casino environment.
Three Roulette Variants, Three House Edges Compared
French Roulette offers a theoretical house edge of 2.70% when La Partage rule is not applied to inside bets. This edge remains consistent with European Roulette's 37 sectors for standard bets like Straight (35:1) or Dozen (2:1). For players seeking to minimize the casino's advantage, this variant presents a lower house edge compared to its American counterpart.
American Roulette, with its inclusion of both a single zero (0) and a double zero (00), presents a significantly higher house edge of 5.26%. While payouts for outside bets like Red/Black remain 1:1 and inside bets like a Straight bet pay 35:1, the additional sector on the wheel doubles the casino's advantage. This makes it a less favourable option for sustained play.
The Five Number Bet on American Roulette, covering sectors 0, 00, 1, 2, and 3, exhibits the highest house edge at 7.89%. This specific wager, unique to the American wheel and offering a 6:1 payout, demonstrates a considerably greater disadvantage for the player compared to standard bets on the same wheel. Its elevated house edge makes it a prohibitive choice for strategic play.
House Edge and RTP: Two Names for the Same Number
Return to Player (RTP) is a theoretical percentage representing the long-term payout of a game, with a higher RTP indicating a lower house edge. For instance, Blackjack with optimal strategy at 6 decks, S17, DAS, DOA rules boasts an RTP of 99.54%, translating to a minimal house edge of 0.46%. This means, on average, for every €100 wagered, €99.54 is returned to players over an extended period.
Conversely, a lower RTP signifies a higher house advantage for the casino. American Roulette, for example, has an RTP of 94.74%, resulting in a substantial house edge of 5.26%. This difference means that for every €100 played on this roulette variant, the casino statistically expects to retain €5.26 over the long run, making it less favourable than games with higher RTPs.
Some Video Poker variants can even offer players a positive expected return. Deuces Wild – Full Pay, when played with optimal strategy and maximum bet, achieves an RTP exceeding 100% at 100.76%, creating a negative house edge of -0.76%. This scenario means players, theoretically, have an advantage if they consistently apply the correct strategy to this specific game.
Baccarat in three steps: bet, reveal, compare
The primary bets in Baccarat are Player, Banker, and Tie, each with distinct RTPs and house edges. The Player bet offers an RTP of 98.76% with a 1.24% house edge, paying 1:1. This bet is favoured by some for its slightly better edge over the Banker bet, before considering the commission.
The Banker bet, despite a commission typically applied to winnings, is often preferred due to its slightly higher theoretical RTP when considering all factors. While the provided data lists the Player bet with a 1.24% edge, the Banker bet, when factoring in its commission, often presents a marginally lower overall house advantage for the casino in practice.
The Tie bet in Baccarat is characterized by a significantly higher house edge, standing at 4.84% with an RTP of 95.16%, even with the common 9:1 payout. This elevated edge makes it a less statistically sound choice for players aiming for longer gameplay or better long-term returns compared to the Player or Banker wagers.
Dozen 2:1 Hits 12 of 37 Numbers
The Dozen bet in French Roulette, covering twelve specific numbers, pays out at 2:1. With 37 sectors on the wheel (1-36 plus a single zero), this bet has a house edge of 2.70%, aligning with the overall edge of European Roulette when La Partage is not active on inside bets.
This bet offers a return of two units for every one unit wagered. For example, a €10 Dozen bet that wins would return €30 (€10 stake + €20 profit). Across the 37 possible outcomes, a win occurs for 12 of those outcomes, while 25 outcomes result in a loss of the initial stake.
The house edge of 2.70% on this bet means that, over an extensive number of plays, the casino retains approximately €2.70 for every €100 wagered on Dozen bets. This makes it a mid-range option in terms of risk and reward within the roulette game, offering a more frequent win than a straight-up bet but a lower payout.
Soft 17: the Ace counts 11 or 1
In Blackjack variations where the dealer stands on Soft 17 (S17), the game's mathematics are optimized for the player. This rule, combined with Double After Split (DAS) and Double Down on Any Two cards (DOA), contributes to a superior RTP of 99.54% with a house edge of just 0.46% when basic strategy is employed.
The designation 'Soft 17' refers to a hand where an Ace can be counted as either 11 or 1. This flexibility is crucial for the dealer, as it provides opportunities to improve their hand without exceeding 21, and the rule dictates they must stand on such a total. This contrasts with 'Hard 17' where no Ace is involved or the Ace is already counted as 1.
The optimal strategy for this specific Blackjack game, which has a 3:2 payout for a natural Blackjack and a 1:1 payout for regular wins, is critical for achieving the stated RTP. Deviating from basic strategy can significantly increase the house edge, making the player's adherence to the correct decisions paramount for maximizing their return.